New Product Marketing
Next
Previous
Contents
Obtaining Patent Protection
Packing Your Own Chute (Part 3)
Recall from last month my statement
that the patent, in and of itself,
is only a marketing tool.
It makes ultimately more sense
to engage in the innovation process
with a low start-up cost,
until you can see how the market
reacts to your product or innovation.
I realize this is a step
away from the mainstream --
and many patent attorneys will advise
against this form of action.
For the mid- to high-technology innovations,
I believe they are right
in fostering the belief
that it is necessary
to file a Formal Patent Application first.
But the bulk of new products we see weekly
could use the method we outlined last month
(the Provisional Patent Application)
to gain invaluable market exposure,
before the huge dollars
are spent on the full-blown patents --
thus allowing the independent inventors
much more opportunity to realize their dream,
within a budget all can afford.
And if at any point the market speaks negatively
about their new product --
if they remain objective --
they can walk away,
with no more costs incurred
than what a new set of tires
for the family automobile would cost --
approximately $500!
Even should you decide to formalize first,
you will still save money
by having your search in hand
when you approach the attorney
you choose to represent you
to the Patent and Trademark Office --
and the opinions you have garnered
will help to offset your costs considerably as well.
Formal Patent Application
Now let's consider the other option
you have in making this critical decision,
the Formal Patent Application.
The first decision you should make in this option
is deciding upon whom to represent you.
Costs are varied for the professional services,
and will run from ridiculous lows to impossible highs.
One extremely effective method
of making the determination
is to join an inventor's group or club
in your local community.
Here you will be able to interact with seasoned inventors
who will have had a number of patents granted,
and can recommend attorneys who have done them
a good job at a fair price.
Also, you will meet up with beginners --
those who are looking for their first patent.
The discussions are often lively,
but the common thread that binds
the majority of these groups together
is the learning experience.
And remember, every dollar you can save up front
becomes a dollar that is put
to better use in the final jump --
the market itself!
So if one member can put you in good graces
with a fair and economical patent attorney,
the price of membership
just paid for itself many times over!
There are two good attorneys I recommend to inventors
for the filing of their Formal Patent Applications,
One is S. Pal Asaji, who can be reached at 1-203-924-9538,
and again, Steven Tollette, available at 1-918-493-5141.
Either of these gentlemen would be glad to quote you prices.
Mr. Asija is a frequent contributor
to the Ideas and Inventions forum
on the subscription internet service Compuserve.
You should also consider
the use of a Registered Patent Agent.
Agents are allowed to file your applications,
but are not allowed to represent you in court.
They are normally about one-half to two-thirds
the price of a practicing attorney.
Most have understudied a patent attorney for several years,
and are very thorough at what they do.
I would advise whenever possible
to use a local attorney or agent
that is recommended to you by another inventor --
although it is only prudent,
and within the scope of how to "pack your own chute",
that you check around for quality and pricing
prior to making the final decision.
You can easily obtain a list
of "registered practitioners"
from either the website
of the Patent and Trademark Office,
or by writing them and requesting the same.
Most U.S. Department of Commerce offices
have this information available as well.
I recommend that whomever you decide to use
to file your Formal Application
be checked out by yourself
to ensure his validity
and the fact that he or she is legally licensed
to practice before the Commissioner of Patents,
or is in fact a registered patent agent.
Whichever method you elect to use
to evolve your conceptual "idea"
into a "patent pending" position,
you should be familiar with the Patent Law
that determines what an application must include.
Article 35, U.S.C. 111, is the paragraph
that specifies the Application for Patent.
This will become prevalent at some point
in the patenting process,
and reads as:
"Application for patent shall be made,
or authorized to be made,
by the inventor, except as otherwise provided in this title.
Such application shall include
(1) a specification as prescribed by Section 112 of this title,
(2) a drawing as prescribed by Section 113 of this title,
and (3) an oath by the applicant
as prescribed by Section 115 of this title."
"The application must be accompanied
by the fee required by law.
The fee and oath may be submitted
after the specifications
and any required drawings are submitted,
within such period and under such conditions,
including the payment of a surcharge,
as may be prescribed by the Commissioner."
"Upon failure to submit the fee and oath
within such prescribed period,
the application shall be regarded as abandoned,
unless it is shown to the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that the delay in submitting the fee and oath was unavoidable.
The filing date of an application
shall be the date on which the specification
and any required drawings are received
in the Patent and Trademark Office."
Should you elect to self-file,
and utilize the method and attorneys listed
along with the Provisional Patent Application,
some of Section 111 will not immediately apply to you.
If your application is well-written,
and thoroughly understandable,
it will not require a drawing.
What you must comply with is the first paragraph
of 35 U.S.C. 112, Specifications.
This paragraph reads as:
"The specification shall contain
a written description of the invention,
and of the manner and process of making and using it,
in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms
as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains,
or with which it is most nearly connected,
to make and use the same,
and shall set forth the best mode
contemplated by the inventor
of carrying out his invention."
Summary
Let's take a moment to review the steps
associated with the "Pack Your Own Chute" methodology.
Remember, objectivity must be exercised,
in every conceivable way.
1. Develop an idea and decide to conceptualize it!
2. Follow standard record keeping requirements for your invention
3. Have a professional search done. If it still looks promising --
Go for it!
4. If there is too much prior art, or your claims would be too narrow --
Quit now!
5. Write your Provisional Patent Application
6. Have the abstract reviewed for content by an attorney
7. Pay your $75.00 Filing Fee and submit your PPA Application
8. Once Notice of Filing is received, approach the market and let it speak!
9. If market shows interest, consider a Formal Patent Application, if not --
Quit !
So now you've learned to "pack your own chute"
when it comes to the innovation process.
This is oversimplifying,
for it would take many volumes and hundreds of pages
to thoroughly explain the intricate procedure
we know as the innovation process.
There are many stumbling blocks,
but there are an equal number of people willing to help.
Take the advice of those who will share it,
apply your knowledge to it,
and tailor it to work for you.
Remember that you have an opportunity
to abandon the effort at any stage
it would be deemed prudent or necessary to do so.
One more thing to consider is that you should attempt
to join a local inventor's club.
Interaction is good action!
The material provided in these three Parts
was not designed nor meant to be legal advice --
only good advice.
I wish every reader good luck with their project.
Our country depends on people such as yourselves!
Next
Previous
Contents
|